Download PDF by James W. Watts: Ritual and Rhetoric in Leviticus: From Sacrifice to

By James W. Watts

ISBN-10: 052187193X

ISBN-13: 9780521871938

Ritual and Rhetoric in Leviticus makes use of rhetorical research to show the explanations in the back of the writing of the principal ebook of the Torah/Pentateuch and its persuasive functionality in old Judaism. Rhetorical research of Leviticus has implications not just for the shape and contents of that e-book, but in addition for realizing the later historical past of the rhetoric of priesthood, of sacrifice, and particularly of scripture.

Show description

Read or Download Ritual and Rhetoric in Leviticus: From Sacrifice to Scripture PDF

Best sacred writings books

The Passionate Torah: Sex and Judaism - download pdf or read online

During this exact number of essays, a few of modern day smartest Jewish thinkers discover a large diversity of primary questions with a purpose to stability historical culture and sleek sexuality. within the previous few many years a couple of factors—post-modernism, feminism, queer liberation, and more—have introduced dialogue of sexuality to the fore, and with it an entire new set of questions that problem accepted traditions and methods of considering.

Read e-book online Head, Eyes, Flesh, and Blood: Giving Away the Body in Indian PDF

Head, Eyes, Flesh, and Blood is the 1st entire learn of a significant narrative subject in premodern South Asian Buddhist literature: the Buddha's physically self-sacrifice in the course of his prior lives as a bodhisattva. undertaking shut readings of reports from Sanskrit, Pali, chinese language, and Tibetan literature written among the 3rd century B.

Read e-book online Text-Critical and Hermeneutical Studies in the Septuagint PDF

Text-critical and Hermeneutical reviews within the Septuagint is the name of a bilateral study undertaking performed from 2009 to 2011 by means of students from the schools of Munich (Germany) and Stellenbosch (South Africa). The joint learn firm was once rounded off through a convention that came about from thirty first of August - 2d of September 2011 in Stellenbosch.

Extra info for Ritual and Rhetoric in Leviticus: From Sacrifice to Scripture

Example text

It is also worth remembering that in antiquity rituals do not seem to have required interpretation unless and until they were contested. 92 And the dominant traditions maintained their position more by the force of custom and tradition than by intellectual apologetics. That remains true even in modernity, despite the emphasis in rabbinic/scholastic/academic traditions on the rationales behind the rituals: within congregations, custom and tradition often trump intellectual rationales in determining normative practice.

24 25 Bryan D. Bibb made a similar point, noting that both performances of rituals and the ritual texts that describe them contain ambiguities that leave worshippers and readers room for personal interpretation. D. Dissertation, Princeton Theological Seminary, 2005], 99–100). Milgrom was aware of the multivalence of sacrifice, at least cross-culturally (Leviticus 1:443; “Systemic Differences,” 322), but he did not grapple with the methodological problem that such multiple meanings, much less an absence of any symbolic interpretation at all, pose to any description of a symbolic system behind ritual practices.

Mary Douglas, In the Wilderness: The Doctrine of Defilement in the Book of Numbers (JSOTSup 158; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993). Douglas, Leviticus as Literature, 39. 16 P1: SBT 052187193Xc01 CUNY775/Watts 0 521 87193 X May 13, 2007 21:15 Reading Mary Douglas Rereading Leviticus meditations to the contents of Leviticus. She seemed quite unconcerned with, if not unaware of, methodological conflicts between these different approaches. She wove them together to create an exposition of Leviticus’ “studied elegance and powerfully contrived structure.

Download PDF sample

Ritual and Rhetoric in Leviticus: From Sacrifice to Scripture by James W. Watts


by William
4.2

Rated 4.98 of 5 – based on 25 votes