By Yucheng Dong, Jiuping Xu
ISBN-10: 9812878904
ISBN-13: 9789812878908
ISBN-10: 9812878920
ISBN-13: 9789812878922
This e-book is meant for researchers and postgraduates who're drawn to the consensus attaining strategy in crew decision-making difficulties. It places ahead new optimization-based selection aid techniques to assist decision-makers locate roadmaps to consensus with minimal alterations. Simulation experiments and comparability research are as a result performed to evaluate the validity of the concept. After examining this booklet, readers will own a couple of useful instruments for construction consensus with minimal alterations within the context of crew decision-making. extra, the proposed process can successfully lessen expenditures in consensus building.
Read Online or Download Consensus Building in Group Decision Making: Searching the Consensus Path with Minimum Adjustments PDF
Similar nonfiction_13 books
This publication offers an in depth advent to the tens of millions of smaller our bodies within the sun process. Written for laymen, novice astronomers and scholars it describes the character and beginning of asteroids, dwarf planets and comets, and provides distinct information regarding their function within the sunlight method.
Quantization on Nilpotent Lie Groups by Veronique Fischer;Michael Ruzhansky PDF
This booklet offers a constant improvement of the Kohn-Nirenberg kind worldwide quantization concept within the environment of graded nilpotent Lie teams by way of their representations. It incorporates a particular exposition of comparable history themes on homogeneous Lie teams, nilpotent Lie teams, and the research of Rockland operators on graded Lie teams including their linked Sobolev areas.
Download e-book for kindle: The Geopolitics of Europe’s Identity: Centers, Boundaries, by N. Parker
This publication pursues an unique point of view on Europe's transferring quantity and geopolitical status: how nations and areas marginal to it effect on Europe as a middle. A theoretical dialogue of borders and margins is built, and set opposed to 9 experiences of nations, areas, and identities visible as marginal to Europe.
Bartlett, John Russell's The Soldiers' national cemetery at Gettysburg PDF
. .. with the complaints at its consecration, on the laying of the corner-stone of the monument, and at its commitment
- Reading Comics: How Graphic Novels Work and What They Mean
- The Limitations of Language
- Phosphorus in Agriculture: 100 % Zero
- Algorithm Engineering: Selected Results and Surveys
Extra resources for Consensus Building in Group Decision Making: Searching the Consensus Path with Minimum Adjustments
Sample text
Then, the individual consistency improving method and the consensus model are proposed, respectively. Finally, several properties of the proposed consensus reaching model are analyzed. (1) Consensus framework The implementation of the iteration-based consensus model deals with a two-step procedure (see Fig. 2). 2 Consensus with Multiplicative Preference Relations 55 Fig. 2 The Iteration-based consensus framework with the multiplicative preference relations (i) Individual consistency improving method The individual consistency improving method firstly uses GICL to measure the individual consistency degree of multiplicative preference relations Ak , k = 1, 2, .
However, the adjustment cost ci is difficult to evaluate in practice. So, we only take into account the adjustment cost in the GDM with utility preferences, and in the later chapters the adjustment cost is not considered. 2 Consensus Under Aggregation Function In the section, we investigate the MCCM under the utility preferences and aggregation functions. Moreover, we extend the MCCM into the maximum expert consensus model (MECM). 2 yields different MCCMs. Here, we examine the MCCMs under the WA operator and OWA operator in detail.
N. If GCCL(Ak ) ≤ GCCL (or GOCL(Ak ) ≤ GOCL), k = 1, 2, . . , n, it doesn’t adjust Ak , k = 1, 2, . . , n. Otherwise, it helps the experts reach the acceptable consensus. Finally, all multiplicative preference relations Ak , k = 1, 2, . . , n, are of acceptably individual consistency and are of acceptable consensus. (2) Individual consistency improving method In the AHP discipline, individual consistency improving methods are very widely investigated [6, 13, 20, 22, 30, 32]. In particular, Xu and Wei [32] proposed an individual consistency improving method based on the EM and Saaty’s consistency index.
Consensus Building in Group Decision Making: Searching the Consensus Path with Minimum Adjustments by Yucheng Dong, Jiuping Xu
by Christopher
4.2